19u geleden
The Ultimate Arch Network Deep Dive (Part 1/4): The Bitcoin Builder's Dilemma 🧵
@ArchNtwrk might actually be onto something big here.
Let me break down why this could be the first real solution to Bitcoin's programmability problem 🧵👇
1/ THE PROBLEM: $2 trillion in Bitcoin just... sitting there.
Bitcoin's Script language is intentionally limited - no loops, no complex logic. Which means no smart contracts, no DeFi. Just storage.
Meanwhile ETH has $50B+ in DeFi. BTC holders see this and want in, but they're not gonna leave Bitcoin's security behind.
2/ THE BUILDER'S DILEMMA:
If you're a dev, you're stuck between two bad options:
Build on Bitcoin → Fort Knox security but you can't do anything interesting
Build on Ethereum → You can build whatever but now you've left Bitcoin
There hasn't been a real Option C... until maybe now.
3/ EVERY "SOLUTION" SO FAR HAS THE SAME FLAW:
Stacks? Bridge to sBTC.
Merlin? Multi-sig bridge.
RSK? Federated bridge.
BOB? BitVM2 bridge.
$2B+ lost to bridge hacks since 2021. Every single one asks you to TRUST someone else with your BTC. That's the problem.
4/ BRIDGE HACKS ARE A FEATURE, NOT A BUG:
Ronin: $600M gone
Poly Network: $600M gone
Wormhole: $320M gone
Every bridge is a custody handoff. Every custody handoff is a trust assumption. Every trust assumption is an exploit waiting to happen.
This is why Bitcoin L2s haven't taken off.
5/ THE WRAPPED ASSET SCAM (kinda):
Here's what bridging actually means:
Lock your real BTC → Get fake BTC (wBTC, sBTC, whatever) on another chain → Pray the bridge doesn't get rekt → Pray the peg holds
Your "Bitcoin" isn't Bitcoin anymore. It's an IOU.
6/ BITCOINERS AREN'T DUMB:
"Not your keys, not your coins" isn't just a meme.
When you bridge, you give up your keys. Even if it's "temporary."
Result? Less than 1% of BTC is in DeFi despite years of "opportunity."
Bitcoiners don't do security trade-offs. Ever.
7/ SO... ARCH NETWORK:
Claims to be the only way to use Bitcoin for DeFi without bridging.
Big claim. How?
Native UTXO execution. You send a Bitcoin transaction, it runs smart contracts, settles on Bitcoin. Your BTC never leaves the Bitcoin network.
If this works, it's huge.
8/ WHAT "BRIDGELESS" ACTUALLY MEANS:
Normal L2: Bitcoin → Bridge → Wrapped thing → L2 → Bridge back → Bitcoin (maybe)
Arch: Bitcoin → Execute → Bitcoin
No middleman. No wrapped tokens. No custody games.
9/ HOW TF IS THIS POSSIBLE?
They're not moving your Bitcoin anywhere.
Instead, they execute smart contracts that work directly with Bitcoin's UTXO model. Your BTC stays on Bitcoin. The execution happens on Bitcoin. Everything settles on Bitcoin.
This is actually novel if it works.
10/ THE TECH STACK:
They're combining:
- Native UTXO execution (no bridging)
- FROST + ROAST cryptography
- eBPF VM (high performance)
- Bitcoin finality (ultimate security)
Each piece solves part of the puzzle
11/ WHAT THIS COULD ENABLE:
If Arch works as advertised:
- Lend BTC, earn yield
- Borrow against BTC
- Trade BTC, Runes, Ordinals on a DEX
- Use BTC as collateral
- Tokenize real-world assets
All without leaving Bitcoin's security model. That's the promise anyway.
12/ THE MARKET GAP IS INSANE:
Bitcoin: $2T market cap
Bitcoin DeFi: ~$8B TVL (fragmented, all bridged)
Ethereum DeFi: $50B+ TVL
The gap is $42B+.
Why? Because Bitcoiners won't bridge their coins.
If Arch actually solves this... yeah.
13/ WHO WINS IF THIS WORKS:
BTC holders: Yield without giving up custody
Developers: Build on Bitcoin without compromises
Institutions: Capital markets without bridge risk
DeFi users: Access real Bitcoin liquidity
Pretty straightforward value prop.
15/ THE PHILOSOPHICAL BIT:
Bitcoin's supposed to be digital gold, right?
But real gold doesn't just sit in vaults. It backs loans. It's collateral. It enables commerce.
Arch could make Bitcoin productive without breaking what makes it Bitcoin.
14/ THE MAXI TEST:
Would Bitcoin maximalists actually use this?
- No bridging = no custody risk
- Native UTXO = real Bitcoin transactions
- Settles on Bitcoin = Bitcoin security
- No altcoin dependencies
- Preserves Bitcoin's properties
On paper, it passes the purity test.
15/ PART 2 COMING:
Next up I'm diving into:
- The tech (ArchVM, eBPF, Rust)
- FROST + ROAST crypto
- Pre-confirmations
- Security model
- Dev experience
Tech deep dive drops next 🚀
3,34K
17
De inhoud op deze pagina wordt geleverd door derden. Tenzij anders vermeld, is OKX niet de auteur van het (de) geciteerde artikel(en) en claimt geen auteursrecht op de materialen. De inhoud is alleen bedoeld voor informatieve doeleinden en vertegenwoordigt niet de standpunten van OKX. Het is niet bedoeld als een goedkeuring van welke aard dan ook en mag niet worden beschouwd als beleggingsadvies of een uitnodiging tot het kopen of verkopen van digitale bezittingen. Voor zover generatieve AI wordt gebruikt om samenvattingen of andere informatie te verstrekken, kan deze door AI gegenereerde inhoud onnauwkeurig of inconsistent zijn. Lees het gelinkte artikel voor meer details en informatie. OKX is niet verantwoordelijk voor inhoud gehost op sites van een derde partij. Het bezitten van digitale activa, waaronder stablecoins en NFT's, brengt een hoge mate van risico met zich mee en de waarde van deze activa kan sterk fluctueren. Overweeg zorgvuldig of de handel in of het bezit van digitale activa geschikt voor je is in het licht van je financiële situatie.