How does a chain translate stablecoin activity into ecosystem value capture?
Well - first off, there has to be activity.
TVL (well, actually AuM) is how stablecoin issuers make money. No one else in the ecosystem makes money on AuM alone.
Generally speaking:
- The apps make money from trading / transaction volumes.
- The network makes money from transaction count
Indexing off of stablecoin AuM (and using AuM / TVL terminology interchangeably) is a very insufficient perspective.
Stablecoin AuM only tells you how big and how full your parking lot is.
Apps; network; ecosystem have no economics unless those stablecoins move.
As an industry we really need to move beyond TVL as the singular north star metric.
Solana might just be winning the GENIUS Era
Solana doesn’t host the most stablecoins. And yet: it boasts the fastest-growing stablecoin supply. In the nearly 3 months since Trump signed the GENIUS Act, Solana’s stablecoins in circulation have jumped over 40%, reaching $15b.
Ethereum remains the stablecoin leader, with $178b. But its growth post-GENIUS Act is much slower than Solana’s: 27%. Other chains have fared even worse (Base, Hyperliquid, Arbitrum) One major player is going in the wrong direction. TRON’s stablecoin supply shrunk nearly 4%.
We’re in the first months of a major shake-up. The GENIUS Act gave companies, banks, etc a green light to start experimenting with stablecoins. Now, these newcomers are weighing where to launch. “Payment stablecoins” (the focus of the GENIUS Act) need fast settlement at low cost to stay viable. There, Solana’s long beat Ethereum. It can leverage this edge to challenge the leader.
What I’m on the lookout for are signs that Solana can accelerate this momentum. The last 30 days have been especially promising. Anchored by a parade of partnerships, DeFi integrations, and product rollouts, Solana added nearly $3b in stablecoins – 25% growth. (Ethereum’s grew just 8% over the same period).
Stablecoins represent one of crypto’s new foundational pillars. Chains that can ride the wave effectively will fare the best long term. This is not a zero sum game: one chain’s victory does not require another’s defeat. But value will accrue most acutely to those platforms that host the most.
27.326
117
Il contenuto di questa pagina è fornito da terze parti. Salvo diversa indicazione, OKX non è l'autore degli articoli citati e non rivendica alcun copyright sui materiali. Il contenuto è fornito solo a scopo informativo e non rappresenta le opinioni di OKX. Non intende essere un'approvazione di alcun tipo e non deve essere considerato un consiglio di investimento o una sollecitazione all'acquisto o alla vendita di asset digitali. Nella misura in cui l'IA generativa viene utilizzata per fornire riepiloghi o altre informazioni, tale contenuto generato dall'IA potrebbe essere impreciso o incoerente. Leggi l'articolo collegato per ulteriori dettagli e informazioni. OKX non è responsabile per i contenuti ospitati su siti di terze parti. Gli holding di asset digitali, tra cui stablecoin e NFT, comportano un elevato grado di rischio e possono fluttuare notevolmente. Dovresti valutare attentamente se effettuare il trading o detenere asset digitali è adatto a te alla luce della tua situazione finanziaria.


