Crypto companies selling both equity and tokens to investors is the single biggest unforced error holding the industry back as an investable asset class You end up with an irreconcilable conflict of interest and misaligned incentives between equity holders and token holders Not a coincidence that the crypto projects establishing token buyback programs with protocol revenue (HYPE, PUMP, LINK) have not sold equity to investors Neither HYPE or LINK raised VC funds either, which is where much of this conflict of interest pressure comes from But clearly this is a problem for a lot of tokens out there, so what do? Short term: If you’re a crypto company, don’t double dip, it’s a self-own. Either sell equity and eventually go public, or treat your token as pseudo equity for the protocol that captures value Long term: We need to establish a regulatory regime that allows for the issuance of ‘protocol equity’ style tokens with enforceable investor protections and clear revenue rights
[ ZOOMER ] CONSENSYS, THE CREATOR OF METAMASK, TO IPO: AXIOS
34.5K
245
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.